Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned notifications issued under Section 168-A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were liable to be invalidated for absence of the GST Council's recommendation, and whether the respondents should be called upon to justify the claimed ratification.
Analysis: The petition raised a challenge to the notifications on the ground that the statutory precondition under Section 168-A required a recommendation of the GST Council. The respondents referred to the 53rd GST Council meeting and the decision of the GST Implementation Committee, but the Court did not render a final adjudication on the validity of the notifications at this stage and instead permitted filing of a counter affidavit on the issue.
Outcome: The matter was left open for counter-affidavit and further hearing, and the respondents were restrained from passing any final order until further orders.