Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>TDS deducted u/s194Q on gross goods value vs commission agent income; mismatch with Form 26AS, full credit allowed</h1> TDS credit was denied by CPC due to mismatch between turnover shown in the books and receipts reflected in Form 26AS, where purchasers deducted TDS u/s ... Denial of TDS credit - TDS credit was denied by CPC on the ground of mismatching in turnover in the books vis-Γ -vis amount as reflected in Form 26AS - purchaser deducted TDS u/s 194Q on gross value of goods which was reflected in Form 26AS whereas the assessee recorded only commission income in its books of accounts - assessee acted as Pucca and Kaccha Arhtiya and registered with Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Kalanwali. HELD THAT:- The provisions of Sec. 194Q do not determine the taxability of income in the hands of the recipient assessee. These provisions merely put on obligation on payer to deduct TDS on high value purchases. The said provisions target buyers with a specific turnover threshold, requiring them to withhold a portion of their payments as TDS as purpose of the provisions is to improve the process of tax collection and ensure clear financial transactions. The specified buyers having turnover of more than Rs. 10 Crores are required to deduct TDS while making purchases of more than Rs. 50 Lacs from a single buyer. However, the gross turnover may not constitute real income of the assessee. The assessee, in the present case, act as a commission agent and sells agricultural produce on behalf of the farmers. The purchasers have deducted TDS while making purchases from the assessee. The assessee, as per statutory mandate, has offered commission income on these transactions. No case has been set up by CIT(A) that the assessee has concealed the gross sales/turnover or the same do not form part of assessee’s books of accounts. Assessee has reimbursed the sale proceeds to the farmers and earned commission out of the same. The Rule 37BA would have no applicability at all since it is not the case that the income arising out of these transactions would be offered to tax in multiple years. There is no dispute that these transactions form part of assessee’s books for this year. The TDS has been deducted qua the assessee and the same has duly been reflected in Form 26AS. In the absence of any allegation that any of the transactions as reflected in Form 26AS do not form part of assessee’s books for this year, full TDS credit could not be denied to the assessee. AO is accordingly directed to allow full TDS credit to the assessee after due verification of Form 26AS. Assessee appeal allowed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED (i) Whether TDS credit deducted under Section 194Q and reflected in Form 26AS can be restricted on a proportionate basis by applying Rule 37BA, merely because the assessee (a commission agent) records only commission income in its books while Form 26AS reflects TDS on the gross value of goods. (ii) Whether, in the absence of any finding that the Form 26AS transactions are not recorded in the assessee's books for the relevant year, the full TDS credit is to be granted to the assessee. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue (i): Proportionate restriction of TDS credit by invoking Rule 37BA where Section 194Q TDS is deducted on gross purchases but only commission income is offered Legal framework (as discussed by the Court): The Court considered Section 194Q as a provision imposing an obligation on specified buyers to deduct TDS on high-value purchases, and examined Rule 37BA only to test whether it justified deferring or restricting credit based on the year of assessability of the corresponding income. Interpretation and reasoning: The Court held that Section 194Q does not determine taxability in the recipient's hands; it operates as a tax-collection mechanism for buyers meeting turnover and purchase thresholds. The gross purchase value on which TDS is deducted may not represent 'real income' of the recipient. On facts, the assessee acted as a commission agent selling agricultural produce on behalf of farmers, reimbursing sale proceeds to them and earning only commission, which was offered to tax. The Court found that Rule 37BA had 'no applicability' because the case was not one where income arising from these transactions was offered across multiple years. The decisive factor was that the transactions to which TDS related formed part of the assessee's books for the relevant year, and there was no established basis to link TDS credit to a proportion of 'sales' disclosed by the assessee as against the gross figures appearing in Form 26AS. Conclusion: Proportionate restriction of TDS credit by applying Rule 37BA, solely due to mismatch between Form 26AS gross value subjected to TDS and the assessee's accounting of only commission income, was held unjustified on these facts. Issue (ii): Entitlement to full TDS credit where Form 26AS reflects deduction 'qua the assessee' and there is no allegation that the transactions are not in the books for the year Legal framework (as discussed by the Court): The Court proceeded on the principle that TDS credit is allowable when TDS is deducted in the assessee's case, duly reflected in Form 26AS, and relates to transactions forming part of the assessee's accounts for the assessment year; verification of Form 26AS was directed. Interpretation and reasoning: The Court noted that no case was set up that the assessee had concealed gross turnover/sales, or that the Form 26AS transactions did not form part of the assessee's books. It emphasized that, in the absence of any allegation or finding that any transaction reflected in Form 26AS was not part of the assessee's books for the year, 'full TDS credit could not be denied.' Since TDS was deducted with respect to the assessee and appeared in Form 26AS, the only remaining step was verification. Conclusion: The Court directed the assessing authority to allow full TDS credit after due verification of Form 26AS, rejecting the denial/restriction of credit in the absence of any adverse finding about non-recording of the relevant transactions for the year.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found