Automatic data processing classification upheld for interactive flat panels; display capability did not make them monitors.

Interactive flat panels with an in-built CPU, operating system, memory, storage, and input-output facilities were held to satisfy Chapter Note 5(A) to Chapter 84 as automatic data processing machines. Applying the tariff headings, section and chapter notes, and the General Rules for Interpretation, the Tribunal found their display function to be incidental to their principal data-processing role. They were therefore correctly classifiable under CTI 8471 4190 and not under CTI 8528 5900 as monitors. The Tribunal also followed prior coordinate-bench decisions on materially similar goods and distinguished the precedent relied on by the Revenue concerning an electronic white board.

---

---

Issues: Whether BENQ Interactive Flat Panels imported by the respondent importer were classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8471 4190 as automatic data processing machines and units thereof, or under Customs Tariff Item 8528 5900 as monitors.

Analysis: The dispute was resolved by applying the tariff headings, the relevant section and chapter notes, and the General Rules for Interpretation. Heading 8471 covers automatic data processing machines and units thereof, while heading 8528 covers monitors and projectors not incorporating television reception apparatus. The goods were found to contain an in-built CPU, operating system, memory, storage, input and output facilities, and to satisfy the conditions of Chapter Note 5(A) to Chapter 84 for an automatic data processing machine. Their display feature was treated as incidental to their principal data-processing function. The Tribunal also relied on prior coordinate-bench decisions on materially similar interactive flat panels and distinguished the revenue's cited precedent concerning an electronic white board.

Conclusion: The goods were held to be correctly classifiable under CTI 8471 4190 and not under CTI 8528 5900.

Final Conclusion: The Commissioner (Appeals) order was sustained and the Revenue's challenge to the classification failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a composite electronic product independently satisfies the statutory conditions of an automatic data processing machine under Chapter Note 5(A), its principal function is data processing and it cannot be reclassified as a monitor merely because it has display capability.

---