Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order, computation sheet and demand notice were liable to be set aside for non-consideration of the petitioner's reply and supporting documents, and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after personal hearing.
Analysis: The impugned order was found to be non-speaking, unreasoned and laconic. It was recorded that the petitioner had filed a detailed response along with relevant documents in answer to the show-cause notice, but those submissions were neither considered nor appreciated before passing the order. Such non-consideration of the reply and documents amounted to lack of application of mind and violation of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted to the authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law after considering the petitioner's reply and documents and after granting an opportunity of personal hearing.