TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the police could debit-freeze the petitioner's bank account in exercise of the power of seizure, or whether attachment of the alleged proceeds of crime had to be sought only before the jurisdictional Magistrate under the BNSS.
Analysis: The power recognised under the earlier criminal procedure regime to seize or prohibit operation of a bank account is confined to property that is stolen, suspected to be stolen, or found under circumstances creating suspicion of an offence. The later statutory scheme under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 separately provides for attachment, forfeiture and restoration of property, and expressly requires the investigating officer to approach the Court or Magistrate for attachment of property believed to be derived, directly or indirectly, from criminal activity. The Court held that seizure under the old regime serves evidentiary purposes, whereas attachment under the new regime is designed to secure proceeds of crime and can be ordered only through the prescribed judicial process. On the facts, the debit freeze was founded on a transfer trail that may at best indicate proceeds of crime, which could not justify direct police freeze without invoking Section 107.
Conclusion: The debit freeze could not be sustained as a police measure under the seizure power, and any restraint over the account had to be obtained by following the attachment procedure before the jurisdictional Magistrate.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded, and the impugned restraint on the bank account was set aside while leaving it open to the investigating agency to pursue the statutory attachment process.
Ratio Decidendi: A bank account that is alleged to contain proceeds of crime cannot be frozen by police as a substitute for attachment where the governing statute requires recourse to the jurisdictional Magistrate for attachment of property derived from criminal activity.
TaxTMI 
