Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notices issued under Section 148 and Section 148A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were invalid for want of jurisdiction because the faceless assessment scheme and the CBDT notification dated 29.03.2022 required issuance by the National Faceless Assessment Centre.
Analysis: The writ petition was disposed of in terms of earlier co-ordinate bench decisions on the same issue. Those decisions held that the faceless assessment scheme applies from the stage of notice under Sections 148 and 148A, that the scheme under Section 151A and the notification issued thereunder governs issuance of such notices, and that departmental circulars, instructions, or office memoranda cannot override the statutory mandate. On that basis, the jurisdiction of the issuing authority to issue the impugned notices was found lacking.
Conclusion: The challenge to the reassessment notices succeeded, and the matter was disposed of in line with the earlier decisions, leaving the revenue free to proceed only in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The impugned notices were not sustained on the jurisdictional objection, and the petition stood disposed of by applying the settled faceless reassessment regime.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute and the notified faceless assessment scheme require issuance of reassessment notices through the designated faceless mechanism, a notice issued otherwise is without jurisdiction, and administrative instructions cannot displace the statutory procedure.