Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the customs authority was bound to furnish the records and valuation details of comparable imports relied upon by other importers so that the petitioner could effectively file objections in the adjudication proceedings.
Analysis: In quasi-judicial proceedings that may fasten civil liability or tax/duty burden, the principles of natural justice require disclosure of the materials relied upon against the affected person. Where the requested particulars are already available with the authority and are relevant to the adjudication, withholding them would impede a fair opportunity to answer the show cause notice. The information sought here related to valuation and assessment of identical goods imported from the same supplier and could support the petitioner's objections, including a plea of discriminatory treatment. The Court held that there was no legal impediment to furnishing such materials and that fairness and reasonableness required disclosure.
Conclusion: The respondent was required to furnish the requested records and particulars, and the petitioner was entitled to rely upon them before the adjudicating authority.
Ratio Decidendi: In quasi-judicial customs adjudication, materials relied upon by the authority and relevant comparable records in its possession must be disclosed to the affected party to satisfy natural justice and fairness.