Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned orders rejecting the petitioner's GST claims were liable to be set aside and the matter relegated to the stage of show cause notice in view of the amended statutory regime and subsequent circulars.
Analysis: The petitioner was found to have delayed filing GST returns and claiming input tax credit for the relevant financial year. In view of the amendment brought by Section 118 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 and the subsequent circulars, the Court considered it appropriate to extend the benefit of the amended position. Since similar matters had already been remanded to the show cause notice stage and the State raised no objection, the impugned orders were set aside and the petitioner was afforded an opportunity to respond to the notice afresh.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to reply to the show cause notice, and the matter was sent back for fresh consideration in accordance with law.