Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods covered by Notification No. 202 of 1988 could be treated as exempted goods for the purpose of computing the aggregate value of clearances under Notification No. 1 of 1993 when the conditions of Notification No. 202 of 1988 were not satisfied and credit had been taken on the inputs.
Analysis: The exclusion in Notification No. 1 of 1993 applied only to goods chargeable to nil rate of duty or goods exempted from the whole of excise duty under another notification. Notification No. 202 of 1988 granted exemption only if its stated conditions were fulfilled, including the requirement that no credit had been taken under the specified credit rules. Once it was admitted that credit had been taken, the respondents were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 202 of 1988. Merely being listed in the table to that notification did not make the goods exempted goods unless the notification was satisfied as a whole.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to exclude the value of those goods under Notification No. 1 of 1993 on the strength of Notification No. 202 of 1988; the Revenue's objection on that issue succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be applied in full, and goods are treated as exempted only when every condition attached to the notification is satisfied.