TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the ITAT erred in cancelling the addition relating to customs duty paid on import of components for export purposes where export was not made by year end; (ii) Whether the ITAT erred in cancelling the addition relating to customs duty on inventory in closing stock; (iii) Whether the ITAT erred in holding that sales tax exemption received from the Government of Haryana was capital in nature.
Issue (i): Whether the ITAT erred in cancelling the addition relating to customs duty paid on import of components for export purposes where export was not made by year end.
Analysis: The question was answered in the negative in view of the Court's decision in the connected matters decided the same day.
Conclusion: No error was found in the ITAT's cancellation of the addition; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the ITAT erred in cancelling the addition relating to customs duty on inventory in closing stock.
Analysis: The question was answered in the negative in view of the Court's decision in the connected matters decided the same day.
Conclusion: No error was found in the ITAT's cancellation of the addition; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether the ITAT erred in holding that sales tax exemption received from the Government of Haryana was capital in nature.
Analysis: The question was answered in the negative in view of the Court's decision in the connected matters decided the same day.
Conclusion: The finding that the sales tax exemption was capital in nature was upheld; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: All framed questions of law were answered against the Revenue, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the connected decision on the same legal controversy governs the framed questions, the issues are answered against the Revenue and the Tribunal's view is sustained.
TaxTMI 
