Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, engaged in providing cable television network services and receiving value that included set top box consideration, could be assessed to tax under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 in the absence of an enabling provision.
Analysis: The assessee was found to be a service provider, and the mere presence of an element relatable to supply of goods did not by itself justify levy under the VAT regime. Tax liability could not be fastened on the basis of calculation, bifurcation or apportionment of the total value unless the charging statute first provided a legal basis for such levy.
Conclusion: The revision failed on merits, as no VAT liability could be sustained on the stated basis against the assessee.