Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents should be restrained, pending further orders, from taking coercive steps to recover drawback already granted to the petitioners on the basis of the impugned clarification dated 25 September 2020.
Analysis: The impugned clarification forming the basis of recovery had already been struck down by the Delhi High Court. In the circumstances, the Court considered it appropriate to grant interim protection and to avoid coercive recovery steps until further orders, with liberty to the parties to seek appropriate orders if the Supreme Court passes any order on the issue.
Outcome: The respondents were directed to take no coercive steps to recover the drawback already granted to the petitioners until further orders.