Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fly ash bricks were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated 01/03/2011 notwithstanding the dispute as to classification under Chapter 68 or Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The exemption notification covered bricks falling under both Chapter 68 and Chapter 69. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that, regardless of the precise tariff classification, bricks were specifically covered by the notification. Since the notification did not exclude the goods on the ground urged by Revenue, the classification dispute did not defeat the exemption.
Conclusion: The exemption was available, and the Revenue's challenge to the Commissioner (Appeals)' view failed.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the grant of exemption and rejected the Revenue's appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification expressly covers the goods under either of the rival tariff chapters, the assessee cannot be denied the exemption merely because Revenue disputes the precise classification.