Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of deduction under section 80P could be made while processing the return under section 143(1)(a), and whether the same disallowance could be sustained in rectification under section 154 on the basis of section 80AC for a return filed beyond the time under section 139(1).
Analysis: The adjustment disallowing the deduction was treated as falling outside the permissible scope of section 143(1)(a)(ii), and the corresponding adjustment under section 143(1)(a)(v) could not be applied for a period prior to 01.04.2021, when the relevant amendment became effective. Since the rectification proceedings merely reiterated the same disallowance, they could not enlarge the scope of the original processing.
Conclusion: The disallowance of deduction under section 80P was not sustainable in the processing or rectification proceedings, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The tax demand founded on the impugned adjustment could not be upheld, and the assessee's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A deduction claim cannot be disallowed through prima facie adjustment under section 143(1)(a), or reiterated in rectification under section 154, unless the adjustment squarely falls within the statutory scope in force for the relevant assessment period.