Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether adjustment under section 143(1) disallowing employees' contribution to PF/ESIC could be made, and whether the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 applied retrospectively to the assessment year in question.
Analysis: The disputed disallowance related to employees' contribution to PF, ESIC and similar funds. The record showed that, before the amendment, there were judicial decisions supporting allowance where payment was made up to the due date of filing the return. In that context, the issue could not be treated as a permissible prima facie adjustment under section 143(1). The later explanation introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 was treated as not retrospective for the assessment year under consideration.
Conclusion: The adjustment under section 143(1) was not sustainable, and the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) was not upheld for the relevant assessment year.