1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Delay condoned; Questions F, G, H covered by earlier 8 April 2009 decision favoring assessee; section 56 left unargued</h1> Delay condoned. Questions F, G and H held covered by a prior SC decision pronounced on 8 April 2009, which was decided in favor of the assessee and ... Applicability of miscellaneous income u/s 56 - High Court has held that the question regarding the applicability of miscellaneous income u/s 56 Department has not argued, hence we are not inclined to examine this question in the present case. 'Delay condoned.' Questions F, G & H are held to be covered by the judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/s. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd. (C.A. No.2206/2009 arising from SLP(C) Nos.593/2008 etc.) pronounced on 8th April, 2009 - the earlier decision being 'in favour of the assessee and against the Department.' As to question I, the High Court observed that the issue regarding the applicability of 'miscellaneous income' under section 56 of the Income-tax Act was not argued by the Department; consequently the Court declined to examine that question in the present petition. The special leave petition is disposed of on those terms.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
