Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rejection of the assessee's application for permanent registration under section 80G was sustainable when the authority applied section 80G(2) instead of section 80G(5), and whether the assessee satisfied the conditions for grant of registration.
Analysis: The assessee's objects were charitable and its activities were found to be genuine. The authority, while considering the application for registration, relied on section 80G(2), which governs deduction to donors and not the grant of registration. The relevant provision for deciding registration is section 80G(5). At the stage of registration, the enquiry is confined to the charitable nature of the objects and the genuineness of the activities; issues relating to application of funds or the benefit under sections 11 and 13 are matters for assessment proceedings.
Conclusion: The assessee satisfied the conditions under section 80G(5) and was entitled to registration under section 80G. The rejection was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.