Deduction under s.36(1)(va) read with s.43B allowed for AY despite later amendment; AO/CPC directed to permit claim

ITAT, Pune (AT) allowed the assessee's deduction under s.36(1)(va) read with s.43B for the impugned AY, holding that due to precedents of the SC and Bombay HC the claim falls within protection despite subsequent amendments requiring deposit by the statutory due date from AY 2021-22 onward. The bench directed the AO/CPC to allow the deduction as claimed in the return and allowed the assessee's appeal.

---

---

ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

1. Whether deduction under section 36(1)(va) for employer's contribution to employees' provident fund (EPF) and ESI is allowable where such contributions were paid after the statutory due date prescribed under the relevant Acts but before the due date of filing the return of income under section 139(1) for the assessment year in question.

2. Whether the amendments made by Finance Act, 2021 - specifically Explanation 1 and Explanation 2 to section 36(1)(va) and the proposed exclusion of section 43B from determining "due date" - operate retrospectively or prospectively, and therefore whether they affect the allowability of deductions for assessment years prior to AY 2021-2022.

3. The legal interplay between section 36(1)(va) and section 43B after the Finance Act, 2021 amendment, and the relevance of authoritative precedents interpreting payment-date versus due-date doctrines for employer contributions to statutory funds.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1 - Allowability of deduction under section 36(1)(va) where EPF/ESI paid after statutory due date but before filing return

Legal framework: Section 36(1)(va) permits deduction for employer's contribution to specified employee funds. Section 43B contains deeming provisions treating certain payments as allowable only on actual payment; historically courts have read these provisions in determining the date of allowance for statutory employer contributions.

Precedent Treatment: The Tribunal relied on binding precedent of the Apex Court and the jurisdictional High Court which held that employer contributions to statutory funds, if paid before the return filing date, are allowable despite being paid after the statutory deposit due date (cases cited in the judgment as authoritative guidance supporting the taxpayer's position).

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal examined the facts that the employer deposited EPF/ESI after the statutory due date but before the return filing date under section 139(1). The Tribunal accepted the uncontested fact of payment before the return filing deadline and applied the pre-amendment legal position that allowance can follow actual payment prior to filing, relying on established decisions interpreting the scope of section 36(1)(va) together with section 43B.

Ratio vs. Obiter: The conclusion that deduction is allowable for payments made before return filing (despite later statutory due date) is treated as ratio in the context of the assessment year under consideration, as it resolves the core dispute.

Conclusion: Deduction under section 36(1)(va) is allowable for the impugned assessment year where employer contributions to EPF/ESI were paid before the due date for filing the return, notwithstanding that payment was after the statutory deposit due date.

Issue 2 - Prospective application of Finance Act, 2021 amendments (Explanation 1 & 2) to section 36(1)(va)

Legal framework: Finance Act, 2021 inserted Explanation 1 and Explanation 2 to section 36(1)(va), defining "due date" and clarifying that section 43B shall not apply for determining "due date." The amendment expressly states it will take effect from 1 April 2021 and apply to AY 2021-2022 and subsequent assessment years.

Precedent Treatment: The Tribunal applied the express legislative effective date and relied on established principles of statutory construction that prospective amendments apply from the date specified and do not ordinarily affect prior assessment years.

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal read the Finance Bill notes and statutory language emphasizing the clause that "This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2021-2022 and subsequent assessment years." On that basis the Tribunal concluded the amendments are prospective; therefore the amended definition of "due date" and the exclusion of section 43B do not govern the impugned earlier assessment year.

Ratio vs. Obiter: The Tribunal's finding regarding prospectivity is ratio insofar as it directly determines whether the new explanations can be invoked to deny deduction for the assessment year before AY 2021-22.

Conclusion: The Finance Act, 2021 amendments to section 36(1)(va) are prospective and apply from AY 2021-2022; they do not affect the allowability of deductions for the impugned assessment year antecedent to that effective date.

Issue 3 - Interplay between section 36(1)(va) and section 43B post-amendment and applicability of precedent

Legal framework: Prior to the 2021 amendment, section 36(1)(va) deductions were considered with reference to section 43B principles; section 43B governs timing of deduction by deeming certain payments as allowable only on actual payment. The amendment's Explanation 2 sought to exclude section 43B from determining "due date" under clause (va).

Precedent Treatment: The Tribunal relied on authoritative decisions (Apex Court and High Court) that had interpreted the interaction between section 36(1)(va) and section 43B in favour of allowing deduction where payment was made before filing of return, thereby protecting such claims for years prior to the amendment.

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal construed the statute and legislative notes to hold that, for assessment years prior to AY 2021-22, the pre-existing relationship between sections 36(1)(va) and 43B (as interpreted by precedent) governs. Since Explanation 2 expressly removes section 43B from determining "due date" only prospectively, the Tribunal found no basis to apply the amended exclusions to the year under appeal.

Ratio vs. Obiter: The Tribunal's holding that pre-amendment jurisprudence regarding s.36(1)(va) and s.43B continues to apply to prior assessment years is ratio for resolving the dispute; any broader comments on future application are obiter.

Conclusion: For the impugned assessment year, the deduction is to be governed by pre-amendment law and controlling precedents; the Finance Act, 2021 amendments do not alter the result for years antecedent to AY 2021-2022. Consequently, section 43B's relevance as interpreted by prior case law remains applicable to the assessment year in question.

Disposition and Direction

Having determined that the Finance Act, 2021 amendments are prospective and that precedent permits allowance where employer contributions were paid before return filing, the Tribunal set aside the appellate authority's order and directed the assessing authority to allow the deduction under section 36(1)(va) as claimed in the return for the impugned assessment year.

---