1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses appeals due to goods not matching Tariff Entry. No costs awarded.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as the goods did not fall under the relevant Tariff Entry. No costs were awarded. - 2002 (146) E.L.T. 487 (SC) , ... Paper The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals regarding the benefit of Notification No. 135/89, dated 12th May, 1989, as goods did not fall under Tariff Entry 4823.90 but under Tariff Entry 3920.31/3920.37. (Case: Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd. [(1997) 10 SCC 350]) No costs were awarded.