Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deficiency memo issued in relation to the drawback claims was sustainable in law, and whether the petitioner was entitled to processing and release of drawback with interest.
Analysis: The petitioner had completed export transactions, the goods had been assessed and permitted for export, and no dispute regarding misdeclaration or under-valuation was recorded. The deficiency memo was used to withhold drawback by questioning the classification already accepted at the time of export, which amounted to reopening of the assessment. The claim was also treated as one requiring immediate processing under the drawback scheme, and the statutory entitlement to interest on delayed payment was invoked.
Conclusion: The deficiency memo was quashed, and the respondents were directed to process the drawback claims and release the drawback amount with interest in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded in securing invalidation of the impugned deficiency memo and obtained consequential relief for release of drawback with statutory interest.
Ratio Decidendi: A deficiency memo cannot be used to reopen or alter an assessment already accepted for export, and where the export is complete and the claim is otherwise in order, the drawback must be processed and released with applicable interest for delay.