Anticipatory bail denied in money-laundering case under Section 45 PMLA over alleged misuse of public funds for personal gain Petition for anticipatory bail in money-laundering proceedings alleging illegal transfer and misuse of state public funds for personal gain was refused by ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Anticipatory bail denied in money-laundering case under Section 45 PMLA over alleged misuse of public funds for personal gain
Petition for anticipatory bail in money-laundering proceedings alleging illegal transfer and misuse of state public funds for personal gain was refused by the HC, which found no case for bail under section 45 of the PMLA. The SC declined to interfere with the HC order and dismissed the special leave petition, leaving the High Court's rejection of anticipatory bail intact.
"Delay condoned." Counsel for the petitioner was heard at length. The Court declined to disturb the impugned High Court order, stating: "We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court." Consequently, "The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed." All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. The decision reflects an exercise of the Court's discretionary jurisdiction to refuse further intervention where the High Court's order is left undisturbed and procedural delay has been excused. Procedural posture: appeal by special leave denied; operative relief: dismissal of the SLP and disposal of ancillary applications.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.