Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Anticipatory bail denied in money-laundering case under Section 45 PMLA over alleged misuse of public funds for personal gain</h1> Petition for anticipatory bail in money-laundering proceedings alleging illegal transfer and misuse of state public funds for personal gain was refused by ... Money Laundering - seeking grant of anticipatory bail - illegal transfer and misuse of the public funds from State Govt. accounts in fraudulent manner for personal gain - it was held by High Court that 'Taking into consideration the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and materials available on record as also in view of section 45 of the P.M.L. Act, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has not made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail and as such, his application for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected.' - HELD THAT:- It is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. SLP dismissed. 'Delay condoned.' Counsel for the petitioner was heard at length. The Court declined to disturb the impugned High Court order, stating: 'We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.' Consequently, 'The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.' All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. The decision reflects an exercise of the Court's discretionary jurisdiction to refuse further intervention where the High Court's order is left undisturbed and procedural delay has been excused. Procedural posture: appeal by special leave denied; operative relief: dismissal of the SLP and disposal of ancillary applications.