Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sealed cover procedure could be applied to deny consideration for promotion and regular placement in Selection Grade, JAG-II and JAG-I when the criminal case was still at the investigation stage and no charge-sheet had been filed at the relevant time.
Analysis: The applicable administrative instructions required one of three conditions to exist before a case could be kept in sealed cover, namely suspension, issued charge-sheet with pending disciplinary proceedings, or pending prosecution for a criminal charge. The later clarification on criminal proceedings adopted the test of institution of judicial proceedings by filing of a police report and cognizance by the Magistrate. On the admitted facts, the matter remained under investigation for the relevant promotion dates, the charge-sheet was filed only later, and the petitioner was not shown to be under suspension or facing pending disciplinary proceedings when the Departmental Promotion Committees met. In those circumstances, the respondents had no lawful basis to withhold promotion consideration through sealed cover or deemed sealed cover.
Conclusion: The sealed cover procedure was wrongly applied for the relevant promotion exercises, and the petitioner was entitled to opening of the sealed covers and reconsideration for Selection Grade, JAG-II and JAG-I with consequential benefits, while sealed cover treatment after filing of the charge-sheet could continue in accordance with law.