TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount deposited in the Central Excise Personal Ledger Account before the close of the relevant accounting year was allowable notwithstanding the liability to excise duty; (ii) whether unutilized MODVAT credit of excise duty standing at the year-end was disallowable; (iii) whether the disallowance of sales tax recoverable was justified under Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961; and (iv) whether software expenditure was allowable as revenue expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether the amount deposited in the Central Excise Personal Ledger Account before the close of the relevant accounting year was allowable notwithstanding the liability to excise duty.
Analysis: The issue was covered by the Court's decision rendered the same day in the connected appeal, and the deposit made before the year-end was treated as satisfying the relevant liability for the purpose in question.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether unutilized MODVAT credit of excise duty standing at the year-end was disallowable.
Analysis: The issue was governed by the Court's decision in the connected appeal, on the basis of which the treatment of the unutilized credit was upheld as not warranting relief to the Assessee.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether the disallowance of sales tax recoverable was justified under Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The claim was examined under the statutory scheme of Section 43B, which permits disallowance where the liability is not allowable in the manner required by that provision.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee.
Issue (iv): Whether software expenditure was allowable as revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The expenditure on software was held to be revenue in character and therefore deductible as claimed by the Assessee.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on issues (i) and (iv), while issues (ii) and (iii) were decided against the Assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Year-end excise-related deposits and software expenditure were allowable on the facts, whereas disallowance under Section 43B was sustained for the item that fell within its statutory prohibition.
TaxTMI 
