Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 153A could be sustained for the relevant assessment years on the basis of an excel sheet seized from a third party's laptop, without confronting the material to the assessee or allowing cross-examination, and whether such electronic material was admissible in the absence of compliance with section 65B of the Evidence Act.
Analysis: The assessment years in question were completed and unabated on the date of search. The material relied upon by the Assessing Officer was not seized from the assessee in the search conducted in its case, but from the laptop of a third party in a separate search. In such a situation, completed assessments under section 153A cannot be disturbed unless incriminating material is found in the assessee's own search. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee was not supplied the seized material or the third party statement and was denied cross-examination, which offended natural justice. Further, the seized excel sheet was an electronic record and no valid certificate under section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act was shown to have been produced, rendering the document inadmissible for the purpose of sustaining the addition.
Conclusion: The addition based on the seized third-party excel sheet was unsustainable and was deleted.