Regular bail in alleged input tax credit fraud granted where investigation was complete and trial delay made custody unjustified.

Regular bail was considered in a prosecution alleging fraudulent input tax credit and allied offences. The Court treated the charge-sheet, substantial custody, limited trial progress, the offence's maximum punishment, the applicant's single antecedent already on bail, and the absence of any concrete risk of absconding or evidence tampering as supporting release. It also noted that the case was triable by a Magistrate and that the trial was unlikely to conclude soon, so further incarceration would amount to pre-trial punishment. Bail was therefore granted with protective conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail in a prosecution concerning alleged fraudulent input tax credit and allied offences.

Analysis: The application was considered in light of the filing of the charge sheet, the period of custody, the limited progress in the trial, the maximum punishment prescribed for the alleged offence, the existence of one antecedent for which the applicant was already on bail, and the absence of any stated risk of absconding or tampering with evidence. The Court also noted that the matter was triable by the Magistrate and that the trial was unlikely to conclude in the near future, so continued incarceration would amount to pre-trial punishment. On that basis, bail was found to be warranted with protective conditions.

Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to regular bail.

Ratio Decidendi: Where investigation is substantially complete, trial is not likely to conclude soon, and no concrete risk of absconding or tampering is shown, continued custody pending a Magistrate-triable prosecution is not justified and bail may be granted with conditions.

---