E-way bill generated after detention does not cure initial default; penalty for transit without the required document was sustained.

Penalty for non-production of the e-way bill was upheld because the vehicle was intercepted in transit without the requisite document, and the bill produced by the petitioner was generated only after detention. Later production before the penalty order did not cure the initial default, as accepting that contention would defeat the statutory purpose by allowing e-way bills to be created only after interception. The cited precedent was held inapplicable because, in that case, the e-way bill had been downloaded before detention and seizure. The writ petition was therefore rejected and the penalty sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained for non-production of the e-way bill when the bill was generated only after the vehicle was detained.

Analysis: The vehicle was intercepted while in transit without the requisite e-way bill. The e-way bill produced by the petitioner showed generation after detention, and its later production before the penalty order did not cure the initial default. Accepting such a plea would permit generation of e-way bills only after detention, defeating the purpose of the statutory requirement. The cited precedent was found inapplicable because, unlike the present case, the e-way bill there had been downloaded before detention and seizure.

Conclusion: The penalty was rightly imposed and the writ petition failed.

---