Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conviction of the applicant should be stayed during pendency of the appeal so as to enable him to contest the forthcoming elections.
Analysis: The prayer was considered on the settled principle that suspension of conviction under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is an exceptional relief, to be granted only where refusal would cause irreversible consequences. The Court applied the factors recognised in precedent, including the gravity of the offence, the social impact, the applicant's antecedents, the nature of the consequences, and whether the harm could be compensated if the appeal ultimately succeeds. On the facts, the applicant had a long political career, was of advanced age, sought to contest imminent elections, and the appeal was not likely to be heard in the near future. The Court treated the resulting electoral disqualification and loss of the opportunity to contest as an irreversible consequence in the peculiar facts of the case.
Conclusion: The conviction was stayed during the pendency of the appeal and the application was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A conviction may be stayed in exercise of appellate powers where, on the peculiar facts of the case, refusal of stay would cause irreversible and uncompensable prejudice, including disqualification from contesting elections.