Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>TDS Credit Allowed Under Sections 194Q and 194A for Commission Agent's Non-Income Gross Sale Proceeds</h1> <h3>SUBBA REDDY MAREDDY Versus ITO - WARD-1 (1) Guntur, Andhra Pradesh</h3> The ITAT Visakhapatnam set aside the orders of the Revenue Authorities denying TDS credit to the assessee, who acted as a commission agent. Relying on ... Denial of Credit of TDS - as submitted that the assessee is only a commission agent and therefore the total gross sale proceeds cannot be treated as the income of the assessee and thereby the Ld. Revenue Authorities have erred in applying the Rule-37BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 - AR reiterated since the assessee is only a commission agent, the assessee is eligible to get credit of the entire amount deducted as tax at source under section 194Q & 194A HELD THAT:- As relying on case of Yagneswari General Traders [2024 (3) TMI 1344 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM] Thota Venkateswarlu [2024 (8) TMI 1478 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM] following the principle of consistency, we have no hesitation to set-aside the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities and direct Ld. AO - CPC to grant credit of the entire amount deducted as tax at source in the case of the assessee. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. ISSUES: Whether a commission agent's gross sales proceeds can be treated as income for the purpose of claiming credit for tax deducted at source (TDS).Whether credit for the entire amount of TDS deducted under Chapter XVII-B is allowable to a commission agent acting on behalf of principals.Whether the provisions of Section 199 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 entitle the person from whose income tax is deducted to claim credit for such TDS notwithstanding discrepancies in the deductor's statements.Whether the Assessing Officer is required to direct the deductor to rectify Form 26AS or modify TDS statements to reflect correct TDS credits. RULINGS / HOLDINGS: The gross sales proceeds effected by a commission agent on behalf of principals cannot be treated as the agent's income; only the commission earned is considered income for tax purposes, consistent with CBDT Circular No. 452 dated 17th March, 1986.The commission agent (kaccha arahtia) is entitled to credit for the entire amount of TDS deducted under Chapter XVII-B, as the turnover for such agents includes only the gross commission and not sales effected on behalf of principals.Section 199 of the Income Tax Act mandates that the sum deducted under Chapter XVII-B is allowable to the person from whose income the deduction was made, regardless of whether the deductor's TDS statement is properly reflected.The Assessing Officer must take necessary steps to ensure proper credit of TDS, including directing the deductor to rectify Form 26AS or TDS statements, rather than denying credit on the ground of incorrect deductor filings. RATIONALE: The Court applied the principle established in CBDT Circular No. 452/1986, which clarifies that for kaccha arahtias (commission agents), turnover for tax purposes includes only gross commission, excluding sales effected on behalf of principals.The Tribunal relied on its prior decisions in cases involving similar facts, including Thota Venkateswarlu vs. ITO and Yegneswari General Traders vs. ITO, which held that commission agents are entitled to full TDS credit on commission income.The Court emphasized the statutory mandate under Section 199 of the Income Tax Act, which entitles the deductee to claim credit for TDS deducted from their income, irrespective of procedural defects in deductor filings.There was no dissent or doctrinal shift; rather, the decision follows established precedent and statutory interpretation, reinforcing the principle of consistency in tax credit claims for commission agents.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found