Petition Dismissed Against Inquiry and Show-Cause Notice Under Ongoing Adjudication Process

The HC dismissed the petition challenging the inquiry and show-cause notice issued by the respondent-authority, noting the petitioner's grievance of harassment without substantive inquiry. The court did not address the merits, observing the matter has been pending since 2019 and the notice was issued less than a year ago. The petition was disposed of with conditions, leaving all contentions open for consideration during the ongoing adjudication by the respondent-authorities.

---

---

ISSUES:

Whether a show-cause notice issued without prior inquiry and on alleged harassment grounds can be quashed.Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief against alleged harassment by the respondent-authorities during the inquiry process.What procedural safeguards must be observed by the respondent-authorities in adjudicating a show-cause notice under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.Whether the adjudication process must be completed within a specified timeframe once the show-cause notice is issued.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

The court allowed amendment of the petition to include the show-cause notice dated 31st March 2023 and relevant submissions, permitting the challenge to the notice.The grievance of harassment by the respondent-authorities was noted, but the court held that the petitioner must co-operate with the adjudication process and that the respondent-authorities shall not cause any harassment.The show-cause notice issued without prior inquiry was not quashed outright; instead, the court directed that the adjudication process must proceed with due opportunity of hearing, including cross-examination if requested by the petitioner.The respondent-authorities were directed to complete the adjudication process within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the order, passing an order in Form GST DRC-07 under Section 74 read with Section 70 and in accordance with Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.The petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits, keeping all contentions open for the adjudication process.

RATIONALE:

The court applied the procedural framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, specifically Sections 70, 74, and 75(4), which govern issuance and adjudication of show-cause notices.The court emphasized the necessity of a fair adjudication process, including the opportunity for hearing and cross-examination, to safeguard the rights of the petitioner.The court recognized the petitioner's grievance of harassment but balanced it against the respondent-authorities' duty to discharge their statutory functions without undue delay, hence imposing a strict twelve-week timeline for completing adjudication.The judgment reflects a procedural approach rather than a substantive ruling on the validity of the show-cause notice, thereby preserving the petitioner's right to raise all contentions during the adjudication.

---