Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be charged on the unpaid penalty and whether the attachment proceedings initiated for recovery could be sustained.
Analysis: The penalty order had attained finality and the amount remained unpaid for several years. Under Section 28A of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, interest becomes payable if the amount is not paid within the stipulated period. In these circumstances, the challenge to the notice of attachment of the bank accounts and demat account did not disclose any merit.
Conclusion: The challenge to the levy of interest and the consequential attachment proceedings was rejected, and the appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a penalty under the SEBI Act remains unpaid beyond the statutory period, interest is payable under Section 28A and recovery attachment pursuant to such default cannot be interfered with merely on the ground that the amount is excessive.