TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal raising substantial questions of law regarding the applicability of the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Specifically, the Court considered: (a) whether the extended period of limitation demand is sustainable against the Respondent; and (b) whether the CESTAT correctly held that no suppression of facts occurred, thus restricting the demand to the normal limitation period. The appeal is to be heard alongside Central Excise Appeal No.31 of 2014 and connected matters.
TaxTMI 
