Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (7) TMI 2063 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT Mumbai allows TP relief on AMP expenses, rejects Bright Line Test application The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding TP adjustments on AMP expenses. The TPO had made ALP adjustments claiming the assessee incurred ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT Mumbai allows TP relief on AMP expenses, rejects Bright Line Test application

                          The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding TP adjustments on AMP expenses. The TPO had made ALP adjustments claiming the assessee incurred conference, marketing and promotion expenses for the benefit of its AE. The Tribunal found the lower authorities relied on an annual report from a different group entity that had no international transactions with the assessee, making it irrelevant. Crucially, the subvention income received by the assessee exceeded the entire ALP adjustment, providing grounds for relief. The Tribunal also rejected the TPO's application of Bright Line Test, citing the Delhi HC decision in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Additionally, regarding disallowance of surgeon/consultant expenses under CBDT Circular No.5/2012 and Section 37(1), the Tribunal followed its own precedent favoring the assessee from AY 2010-11, holding the expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.




                          ISSUES:

                          • Whether advertising, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses incurred by a low risk distributor constitute an international transaction with the associated enterprise (AE) under Section 92B of the Income Tax Act.
                          • Whether the AMP expenses incurred by the assessee benefit the AE and require arm's length price (ALP) adjustment.
                          • Whether subvention income received from AE compensates the assessee for AMP expenses and precludes further ALP adjustment.
                          • Whether the application of the Bright Line Test (BLT) to AMP expenses for ALP adjustment is valid.
                          • Whether expenses incurred on surgeons/consultants as part of marketing promotion expenses are allowable deductions under the Income Tax Act, considering CBDT Circular No.5/2012 and the Explanation to Section 37(1) of the Act.

                          RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

                          • The court held that the AMP expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee's own business to create awareness and educate doctors about its products, and thus did not constitute an international transaction with the AE under Section 92B.
                          • The court found that even if the AMP expenses were considered as services rendered to the AE constituting an international transaction, the subvention income received by the assessee from the AE fully compensated these expenses, negating the need for any ALP adjustment.
                          • The court rejected the application of the Bright Line Test for ALP adjustment, noting that it was negatived by a higher court and thus not applicable.
                          • Regarding expenses on surgeons/consultants, the court allowed the expenditure, holding that such expenses are incurred for business purposes and are not prohibited by law or the Medical Council of India (MCI) regulations, and thus are deductible under the Income Tax Act.

                          RATIONALE:

                          • The court applied the provisions of Section 92B of the Income Tax Act and its Explanation, which define "international transaction" to include provision of services to AEs, but emphasized the factual context that the AMP expenses were for the assessee's own distribution business and did not confer benefit on the AE.
                          • The court relied on the subvention income arrangement under supplementary distribution agreements, whereby the AE compensates the assessee to maintain arm's length margins, concluding that this income effectively covers the AMP expenses, precluding double adjustment.
                          • The court referred to judicial precedent negating the Bright Line Test in transfer pricing matters, thereby disallowing its use for ALP adjustment in this case.
                          • For the disallowance of expenses on doctors/surgeons, the court examined the scope of MCI regulations and CBDT Circular No.5/2012, concluding that these apply only to medical practitioners and not to pharmaceutical or medical device companies, and that the expenses were incurred for legitimate business purposes such as training and product awareness.
                          • The court noted that the Explanation to Section 37(1) prohibits allowance of expenditure incurred for an offence or prohibited by law, which was not established in this case.

                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found