Assessee wins appeal as no disallowance under section 14A possible without exempt income

The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee's appeal against CIT's revision order u/s 263. The CIT had set aside AO's assessment orders u/s 153A, directing fresh orders on disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D, claiming the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue's interest. The Tribunal held that since the assessee earned no exempt income in the relevant assessment year, no disallowance u/s 14A could be made, citing PCIT vs. IL & FS Energy Development Company Ltd. precedent. The Tribunal concluded that AO's assessment orders were not erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue's interest, as twin conditions for invoking section 263 were not satisfied, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal.

---

---

ISSUES:

• Whether disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules can be made when no exempt income (such as dividend income) is earned during the relevant assessment year.
• Whether the assessment orders passed under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 are erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue so as to justify revision under section 263.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

• The Court held that "where the assessee had not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year there could be no disallowance in terms of section 14A read with Rule 8D."
• The assessment orders passed under section 153A for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 were found to be "not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue" as the "twin conditions are not satisfied for invoking the provision of section 263."
• The orders passed under section 263 revising the assessment orders on the ground of disallowance under section 14A were quashed.

RATIONALE:

• The Court relied on binding decisions of the jurisdictional High Court which held that disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be made in the absence of exempt income.
• The Court noted that the Assessing Officer had issued notices and the assessee had submitted replies confirming no exempt income or deductions under chapter VI or section 10 were claimed.
• The Court distinguished the non-jurisdictional High Court decisions relied upon by the revising authority and emphasized adherence to jurisdictional High Court precedents.
• The Court applied the statutory framework of sections 14A, 153A, and 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the relevant Rules, confirming that revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest, which was not established here.

---