Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte appellate order deserved recall under section 254(2) on the ground that the assessee had not received notice of the hearing and its non-appearance was neither intentional nor deliberate.
Analysis: The assessee sought recall of the earlier dismissal for non-representation, asserting absence of notice for the relevant hearing date. The Revenue did not oppose the request. On the record and the parties' submissions, the Tribunal found that the absence of the assessee on the hearing date was attributable to lack of notice and not to any deliberate default. In such circumstances, recall was warranted to secure an effective opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The ex parte order was recalled and the assessee's miscellaneous application was allowed.