TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Section 148A(d) challenge denied interim relief as assessment proceedings continue without interference</h1> <h3>Mustafa Huseni Chunawala Versus The Union of India And Ors.</h3> The HC refused to grant interim relief in a challenge to an order passed under Section 148A(d). The court held that there was no scope for interim orders ... Validity of order passed by the respondent authority under clause (d) of Section 148A - HELD THAT:- No scope of any interim order in the matter and impugned assessment proceeding cannot be interfered at this stage. Let the respondent file affidavit in opposition within four weeks from date. Petitioner to file reply, if any, thereto, within two weeks thereafter. List this matter after seven weeks from date. The Calcutta High Court, through Hon'ble Justice Md. Nizamuddin, declined to grant any interim relief, holding that 'there is no scope of any interim order' and the 'impugned assessment proceeding cannot be interfered at this stage.' The Court directed the respondent to file an affidavit in opposition within four weeks, with the petitioner allowed a two-week period to reply. The matter is scheduled for further hearing after seven weeks, with parties required to be prepared with concise written arguments.
TaxTMI 
