Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Cooperative societies win appeals against 80P deduction denial for belated returns under section 143(1)(a)(v)</h1> <h3>Shri Bhagyalaxmi Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru</h3> The ITAT Panaji allowed appeals by cooperative societies challenging denial of 80P deduction for belated returns. The CPC had disallowed the deduction ... Denial of 80P deduction - Adjustment u/s 143(1)(a)(v) - return filed beyond due date prescribed u/s 139(1) - eligibility of claims made in the belated return - HELD THAT:- Apparently out of two riders laid in s/s (5) of section 80A and clause (ii) of section 80AC of the Act, the later rider is seems to have rightly attracted. For the reasons the Ld. CPC rejected the claim while processing the ITR summarily u/s 143(1) of the Act, and finding no fault therewith the Ld. NFAC has dismissed the appeal on this score. In present appeals we note that, the appellant societies have furnished their ITR albeit beyond the prescribed due date (filed belated) and however those were filed with an eligible claim for 80P deduction therein. Therefore jurisdiction of Ld. CPC s/c (v) of clause (a) of sub section (1) of section 143 of the Act is not available as the matter of fact that s/c (v) (supra) was amended by the Finance Act, 2021 wherein instead of reference to Sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80- ID or Section 80-IE, the provision instead makes a mention of Section 10AA or under any of the provisions of Chapter VI-A under the head 'C- Deductions in respect of certain incomes'. Accordingly, the enabling provisions to address the amendment in Section 80-AC(ii) by Finance Act, 2018 came into play only in 2020-21 assessment year. Thus, no doubt Section 80AC as amended by the Finance Act, 2018 mandated that even for claiming deduction claimed u/s 80P, the return of income was to be filed before the due date as specified u/s 139(1) of the Act. CPC to insist upon the compliance by way of making a disallowance owning to filing the return belated, the power vested in the said Authority only vide Finance Act, 2021 and came into effect accordingly. Therefore, in the absence of the enabling jurisdiction provisions, the Ld. CPC lacked the jurisdiction to make any disallowance of claim made u/c VI-A of the act while processing the return summarily u/s 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act. Assessee appeal allowed. The core legal questions considered by the Tribunal in these appeals are twofold: (1) the eligibility of the assessee credit co-operative societies to claim deduction under section 80P of Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), and (2) the jurisdiction of the tax authorities, particularly the Central Processing Centre (CPC), to disallow the 80P deduction during summary assessment under section 143(1) of the Act.Regarding the first issue, the Tribunal examined the interplay between the provisions of section 80A(1), section 80A(5), and section 80AC(ii) of the Act as applicable from the assessment year (AY) 2018-19 onwards. Section 80A(1) allows certain deductions under Chapter VI-A from gross total income, subject to conditions. Section 80A(5) mandates that such deductions are allowable only if claimed in the return of income. Section 80AC(ii), introduced by the Finance Act, 2018, further restricts the allowance of deductions under Chapter VI-A by requiring that the return of income claiming such deductions must be filed within the due date prescribed under section 139(1) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that these provisions collectively establish a 'twin rider' condition: a deduction under Chapter VI-A, including section 80P, is permissible only if the claim is made in a return filed on or before the due date.The Tribunal provided a detailed tabular illustration clarifying the allowability of deductions under Chapter VI-A depending on whether the original or revised return was filed within or beyond the due date, both for AYs up to 2017-18 and from AY 2018-19 onwards. This table reinforced that from AY 2018-19, no deduction under Chapter VI-A is allowed if the return claiming it is filed after the due date, regardless of whether the claim was made.In the present cases, both credit co-operative societies filed their returns for AY 2018-19 beyond the due date prescribed under section 139(1), albeit with claims for deduction under section 80P. The CPC, during summary assessment under section 143(1)(a)(v), disallowed the 80P deductions relying on section 80AC(ii) and the relevant provisions of section 143(1), which was subsequently upheld by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) on appeal.The second issue concerned the jurisdictional competence of the CPC to disallow the 80P deduction during summary assessment under section 143(1)(a)(v). The Tribunal noted that the power of the CPC to make adjustments under section 143(1)(a)(v) was amended by the Finance Act, 2021, which came into effect only from AY 2020-21 onwards. Prior to this amendment, the CPC's power to disallow deductions under Chapter VI-A, including section 80P, during summary assessment was not explicitly conferred. The Tribunal observed that the relevant amendment replaced the earlier reference to specific sections with a broader reference to Chapter VI-A deductions, thereby expanding CPC's jurisdiction from AY 2020-21 onwards.Applying this legal framework to the facts, the Tribunal found that although the Finance Act, 2018 introduced the requirement of timely filing for claiming deductions under section 80P, the CPC did not have the jurisdiction to disallow such deductions during summary assessment for AY 2018-19, as the amendment empowering CPC to do so came only into effect from AY 2020-21. Hence, the CPC's disallowance of the 80P deduction in these cases exceeded its jurisdictional authority at the relevant time.The Tribunal further relied on judicial precedents from coordinate benches, including decisions in 'Lanjani Co-Operative Agri Service Society Ltd. vs DCIT', 'Lunidhar Seva Sahkari Mandali Ltd. vs Assessing Officer (CPC)', and 'Karohta Co-Operative Agriculture Service Society Ltd. vs ITO', which have held similarly that CPC lacked jurisdiction under section 143(1)(a)(v) to disallow Chapter VI-A deductions for returns filed beyond the due date prior to the Finance Act, 2021 amendment.Addressing the competing arguments, the Tribunal considered the Revenue's reliance on section 80AC(ii) to deny the deduction and the NFAC's confirmation of the disallowance. However, it rejected this stance on the ground that the CPC's power to enforce this provision through summary assessment was not yet in force for AY 2018-19, thereby rendering the disallowance legally untenable. The Tribunal did not find any fault in the assessee's claim for deduction made in the belated returns per se but emphasized the jurisdictional limitation of the CPC at the time of assessment.Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders of the NFAC and directed the CPC to reverse the disallowance and accept the claim of deduction under section 80P as made in the returns filed by the assessee societies. Both appeals were allowed accordingly.Significant holdings from the judgment include the following verbatim legal reasoning: 'The cumulative reading of both, s/s (5) of section 80A and clause (ii) of section 80AC of the Act unambiguously lays down that, from AY 2018-19 a claim for deduction u/c VI-A of the Act is allowable to assessee utterly when such claim is made in return of income filed within statutory due date prescribed u/s 139(1) of the Act.' Further, 'the power vested in the said Authority [CPC] only vide Finance Act, 2021 and came into effect accordingly. Therefore, in the absence of the enabling jurisdiction provisions, the Ld. CPC lacked the jurisdiction to make any disallowance of claim made u/c VI-A of the act while processing the return summarily u/s 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act.'The core principles established are: (1) from AY 2018-19, deductions under Chapter VI-A, including section 80P, are allowable only if claimed in a return filed within the due date under section 139(1); (2) the CPC's jurisdiction to disallow such deductions during summary assessment under section 143(1)(a)(v) was effective only from AY 2020-21 following the Finance Act, 2021 amendment; (3) for AY 2018-19, CPC lacked jurisdiction to disallow 80P deductions in belated returns during summary assessment; and (4) appellate authorities must set aside such disallowances made without jurisdiction.In final determinations, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the NFAC orders, and directed the CPC to accept the 80P deduction claims as made in the belated returns for AY 2018-19, thereby restoring the assessee societies' entitlement to the deductions under the law applicable at that time.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found