Petitioner granted leave to amend writ petition after acknowledging absence of territorial jurisdictional averments The Delhi HC addressed a preliminary objection challenging territorial jurisdiction, with respondent's counsel arguing no part of the cause of action ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petitioner granted leave to amend writ petition after acknowledging absence of territorial jurisdictional averments
The Delhi HC addressed a preliminary objection challenging territorial jurisdiction, with respondent's counsel arguing no part of the cause of action arose within the court's jurisdiction. Petitioner's counsel acknowledged the absence of jurisdictional averments in the writ petition but was granted leave to amend. The court directed that the jurisdictional issue would be examined after filing the amendment application and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.05.2023.
The Delhi High Court, before Justices Rajiv Shakdher and Tara Vitasta Ganju, addressed a preliminary objection raised by the respondent's counsel, Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, challenging the Court's territorial jurisdiction over the writ petition on the ground that "no part of the cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court." The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, acknowledged the absence of any averment regarding jurisdiction in the writ petition but sought and was granted "leave to amend the writ petition." The Court directed that once the amendment application is filed, the jurisdictional issue will be examined, and listed the matter for further hearing on 22.05.2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.