Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether applications filed between 01.02.2021 and 31.03.2021 under the settlement scheme could be treated as pending applications in view of Section 245C(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, and whether orders rejecting such applications for want of a pending case on 31.01.2021 were sustainable.
Analysis: The Court followed the Division Bench decision of the Madras High Court and adopted its reasoning that the amended cutoff in Section 245C(5) could not be applied retrospectively to defeat applications arising during the relevant interim period. The impugned circular and rejection orders, to the extent they treated applications filed between 01.02.2021 and 31.03.2021 as ineligible merely because no case was pending on 31.01.2021, were inconsistent with that interpretation.
Conclusion: The cutoff was read down, the applications were to be treated as pending, and the rejection orders were set aside.