TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additional evidence could be admitted before the Tribunal and the matter remitted to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The documents sought to be produced were relevant to the dispute and went to the root of the addition. The assessee had sought adjournment before the first appellate authority and was shown to have been prevented by reasonable cause from filing the material at that stage. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that additional evidence may be admitted in the interest of justice where it is necessary for proper adjudication and where the party was prevented by sufficient cause from producing it earlier.
Conclusion: Additional evidence was admitted and the matter was remitted to the first appellate authority for de novo adjudication after considering such evidence.
Final Conclusion: The assessment issue was restored for fresh consideration with an opportunity to place the relevant material on record, without any finding on the merits of the addition.
Ratio Decidendi: Additional evidence may be admitted in appellate proceedings when it is materially relevant to the controversy and the party was prevented by sufficient cause from producing it earlier, if admission is necessary for proper adjudication in the interest of justice.
TaxTMI 
