TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Legal Challenge Dismissed: Specific Case Restrictions Upheld Without Broad Precedential Impact on Adjudicating Authority</h1> <h3>Directorate of Enforcement Versus Prakash Industries Ltd And Anr. & Hi Tech Mercantile Pvt Ltd And Ors.</h3> Directorate of Enforcement Versus Prakash Industries Ltd And Anr. & Hi Tech Mercantile Pvt Ltd And Ors. - TMI The Delhi High Court, in LPA 179/2022 and LPA 180/2022, addressed appeals challenging the Single Judge's order dated 3rd March 2022, which stayed proceedings before the adjudicating authority. The appellant limited relief to contesting the observation in para 3 of the impugned order, which stated: 'it would be inappropriate to grant liberty to the Adjudicating Authority to independently rule on the questions which are raised here.' The Court clarified that this direction was based on the specific grounds urged by the respondents and the particular facts of the case, emphasizing that it was not a general precedent. The Court held that the Single Judge's restriction on the adjudicating authority was justified under the circumstances, as the issues raised were to be decided by the Court. Consequently, the appellant did not press the appeals further, and the appeals and related applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
