TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Judicial Body Rejects Appeal Against Tax Tribunal Order, Validates Original Decision Without Substantial Merit</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OR CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, CHANDIGARH I Versus M/s OCEANIC CONSULTANT PVT LTD</h3> SC dismissed the appeal challenging a CESTAT order, finding no substantial grounds to interfere. The court condoned the delay in filing and rejected the ... Classification of service - intermediary service or not - whether the services rendered by the appellants to the overseas master i.e. M/s OCA constitutes an export of service during the impugned period i.e. 2009-10 to 2013-14? - Intermediary Service post 01.07.2012 or not - violation of principles of natural justice - extended period of limitation - penalties - it was held by CESTAT that the services rendered by the appellants to M/s OCA during the period 2009-10 to 2013-14 constituted export of service and did not fall under the category of 'Intermediary Services' post 01.07.2012. HELD THAT:- There are no good reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh. Appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court of India, through Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, condoned the delay in filing the appeal. After considering the submissions and materials, the Court found 'no good reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh.' Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
