Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (2) TMI 1182 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cooperative Sector Deduction Survives: Late Filing Can't Block Section 80P Benefits Retroactively The Tribunal addressed whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) could disallow a deduction under section 80P for late return filing in AY 2018-19. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Cooperative Sector Deduction Survives: Late Filing Can't Block Section 80P Benefits Retroactively

                          The Tribunal addressed whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) could disallow a deduction under section 80P for late return filing in AY 2018-19. Ruling in favor of the assessee, the Tribunal held that the 2021 amendment empowering CPC to deny deductions for late filing was prospective and not applicable retrospectively. The CPC's disallowance was deemed improper, and the deduction under section 80P was to be allowed for the assessment year in question.




                          1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                          The core legal question considered by the Tribunal is whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) was justified in denying the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the income tax return was filed belatedly, i.e., after the due date prescribed under section 139(1) of the Act, for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.

                          In particular, the issue involves the interpretation and applicability of the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, which empowered the CPC, effective from AY 2021-22, to disallow deductions under section 80P if the return was not filed within the statutory time limit. The Tribunal was required to determine whether this provision could be applied retrospectively to AY 2018-19, and consequently, whether the denial of the deduction by the CPC was legally sustainable.

                          2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                          Issue: Whether CPC was justified in disallowing deduction under section 80P for AY 2018-19 on account of late filing of return.

                          Relevant legal framework and precedents:

                          Section 80P of the Income-tax Act provides deductions to primary agricultural credit societies and cooperative societies carrying on banking business. The return of income is required to be filed within the due date specified under section 139(1) for claiming such deductions.

                          An amendment by the Finance Act, 2021, effective from 01.04.2021 (AY 2021-22 onwards), introduced clause (v) in section 143(1)(a) of the Act, empowering the CPC to disallow deductions under Chapter VI-A, including section 80P, if the return is not filed within the prescribed due date under section 139(1). Prior to this amendment, no such mechanism existed for the CPC to deny deductions on this ground.

                          The Tribunal relied heavily on a Coordinate Bench decision in the case of Finolex Industries Ltd. Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., wherein it was held that the amended provision under section 143(1)(a)(v) could not be applied retrospectively to AYs prior to 2021-22. The decision clarified that for AY 2018-19, the CPC had no authority to disallow the deduction under section 80P on the ground of late filing.

                          Court's interpretation and reasoning:

                          The Tribunal observed that the amendment empowering the CPC to disallow deductions under section 80P for late filing came into effect only from AY 2021-22. Since the instant case pertains to AY 2018-19, the CPC's action of disallowing the deduction was without legal basis and amounted to an error.

                          The Tribunal noted that the statutory language of section 143(1)(a)(v) specifically includes deductions under Chapter VI-A only from the date of amendment and does not apply retrospectively. Furthermore, the Tribunal examined the definition of "incorrect claim" under section 143(1)(a)(ii) and found that deduction under section 80P is not included within its ambit, thereby excluding the possibility of disallowance under this provision for the AY in question.

                          Key evidence and findings:

                          The assessee filed the return belatedly for AY 2018-19 and claimed deduction under section 80P. The CPC disallowed the deduction citing late filing. The appellate authority upheld the disallowance but advised the assessee to seek condonation of delay from the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT) under a Government of India instruction dated 03.08.2023. However, this instruction was not binding on the statutory interpretation of the Act.

                          The Tribunal found that the CPC's disallowance was based on the amended provisions effective from AY 2021-22, which could not be invoked for AY 2018-19. This was corroborated by the Coordinate Bench ruling.

                          Application of law to facts:

                          Applying the law as it stood during AY 2018-19, the Tribunal concluded that the CPC had no authority to deny the deduction under section 80P on the ground of late filing. The amendment empowering such denial was prospective and not retrospective. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to the deduction despite the belated filing of the return.

                          Treatment of competing arguments:

                          The Revenue contended that late filing should attract denial of deduction under section 80P as per the amended provisions and that the assessee could seek condonation of delay from the CCIT. The Tribunal rejected this, holding that the amendment was not applicable to AY 2018-19 and that the CCIT's condonation power did not override the statutory provisions. The Tribunal gave precedence to the clear statutory language and the Coordinate Bench precedent.

                          Conclusions:

                          The Tribunal concluded that the CPC erred in disallowing the deduction under section 80P for AY 2018-19 on the ground of late filing. The amendment empowering such disallowance was not applicable to the AY in question. The impugned order denying the deduction was reversed, and the deduction was to be allowed by the Assessing Officer.

                          3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                          The Tribunal emphasized the following crucial legal reasoning:

                          "Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act spells out that if any deduction is claimed under any of the provisions of Chapter VI-A which include deduction u/s 80P such deduction has to be allowed only if the return is filed within due date specified under sub-section 139(1) of the Act. However, clause (v) was inserted by the Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f. 01-04-2021. The case of the assessee, on the other hand, is for F.Y. 2018-19 relevant to A.Y. 2019-20 which is the period prior to amendment brought in by the Finance Act, 2021. Before this amendment, clause (v) did not include and cover deduction u/s 80P. So therefore, in the present Case of the assessee though admittedly return was filed beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 139(1) of the Act but still section 143(1)(a)(v) is not applicable to the assessee since the case of the assessee is for A.Y. 2019-20, which is before the amendment."

                          The core principle established is that statutory amendments introducing procedural safeguards or penalties cannot be applied retrospectively unless expressly stated. The CPC's power to disallow deductions under section 80P for late filing of returns is a procedural safeguard introduced only from AY 2021-22 onwards and cannot be invoked for AY 2018-19.

                          Final determinations on the issue were as follows:

                          • The CPC was not justified in disallowing the deduction under section 80P for AY 2018-19 on the ground of late filing.
                          • The amendment empowering such disallowance under section 143(1)(a)(v) is prospective and applies only from AY 2021-22 onwards.
                          • The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P for AY 2018-19.
                          • The appeal of the assessee was allowed accordingly.

                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found