TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petition, Upholds Lower Court Decision Under Article 136 Without Substantial Grounds for Intervention</h1> <h3>SAURABH KUMAR AGARWAL Versus THE CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</h3> SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay, finding no merit for judicial intervention under Article 136. The Court ruled against ... Rejection of appeal on the ground that the Tribunal had no statutory power to condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - it was held by High Court that 'Since the present appeal is with regard to the limitation period, we are of the view that we cannot intervene in the matter in any manner. The explanation of the counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant that the appellant was suffering from Tuberculosis though may give rise to a right in equity, but the same cannot percolate to right under the statute.' HELD THAT:- No case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. The Supreme Court of India, with Hon'ble Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan presiding, heard the petitioner's counsel. The Court condoned the delay but held that 'no case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.' Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
