1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tax Dispute Resolved: Tribunal Reduces Bogus Purchases Addition from 12.5% to 5% Based on Precedent and Accounting Review</h1> ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee's appeal in a tax dispute. The tribunal reduced the addition for alleged bogus purchases from 12.5% to 5%, ... Estimation of income - bogus purchases - HELD THAT:- Commissioner has affirmed the addition @ 12.5% of the bogus purchases and the Assessee is engaged in the business of ferrous articles and there are various judgments by the Jurisdictional Tribunal, wherein the addition @5% in the identical trade has been upheld, therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, it would be appropriate to restrict the addition being the gross profit @ 5% of the alleged bogus purchases instead of 12.5% as made by AO and affirmed by Commissioner. Thus, the AO is directed to verify βwhether the purchases made by the Assessee as alleged bogus purchases, have already been subjected to profit & loss accountβ and on finding answer βYesβ then to re-compute the income of the Assessee by considering the GP @ 5% in lieu of 12.5%, over and above the GP already shown by the Assessee. Otherwise, the addition as affirmed by the Ld. Commissioner would sustain. Appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed. The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Mumbai), per Judicial Member Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, heard the Assessee's appeal against the order dated 07.05.2024 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Center/Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for A.Y. 2009-10. The issue concerned addition on alleged bogus purchases at 12.5% of the value, affirmed by the Commissioner.Noting that the Assessee is engaged in the business of ferrous articles and referencing precedent from the Jurisdictional Tribunal upholding a 5% addition in identical trade cases, the Tribunal held it appropriate to restrict the addition to 'gross profit @ 5% of the alleged bogus purchases' instead of 12.5%. The AO was directed to verify 'whether the purchases made by the Assessee as alleged bogus purchases, have already been subjected to profit & loss account.' If yes, income is to be recomputed considering GP @ 5% in lieu of 12.5%, over and above the GP shown by the Assessee; otherwise, the addition at 12.5% stands.The appeal was thus partly allowed.