Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the items used to harden and polish the final product were capital goods used for producing or processing goods within Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, so as to justify Modvat credit and give rise to a referable question of law under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The expression in Rule 57Q was wide enough to cover machinery, equipment, tools, appliances and their components, spare parts and accessories used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about any change in any substance for the manufacture of the final product. The items in question were found to be used in the manufacturing process to harden and polish the final product. Such use amounted to processing, and therefore the claim for Modvat credit was within the scope of the rule. As the Tribunal's view accorded with the rule, no referable question of law arose.
Conclusion: The claim for Modvat credit was admissible and the petition for reference failed.