Interest on compensation award must be bifurcated: 9% accretion non-taxable, 15% delay interest taxable under Section 145A(b)

ITAT Cochin held that interest received by assessee on compensation award should be bifurcated for tax treatment. Interest at 9% per annum for one year on additional compensation was considered accretion to value, not taxable income under Section 145A(b). However, interest at 15% per annum for delayed deposit constituted taxable income. AO incorrectly treated entire interest as income from other sources. Matter remanded to AO for verification and proper computation, allowing only 15% interest component for disallowance while granting appropriate deductions under Section 57. Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in this judgment include:

• Whether the interest received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act should be treated as part of the compensation or as income from other sources.
• Whether the interest received under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, specifically the interest at 15% for delayed payment, constitutes income from other sources.
• Whether the entire interest received by the assessee should be regarded as revenue in nature and taxed accordingly.
• Application of Section 145A(b) and Section 56(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act in determining the taxability of interest on compensation.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

1. Nature of Interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act allows for interest on excess compensation awarded by a court. The Supreme Court in CIT vs. Ghanashyam (HUF) held that interest under Section 28 forms part of the compensation.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal considered whether the interest received by the assessee under Section 28 should be treated as part of the compensation or as income from other sources. The Tribunal noted that the interest at 9% for one year was by way of accretion to the value of the land, thus not falling within the ambit of "interest" as per Section 145A(b) of the Income Tax Act.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal concluded that the interest received at 9% under Section 28 is compensatory in nature and should not be treated as income from other sources.

2. Nature of Interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act mandates additional interest at 15% for delayed payment of compensation beyond one year.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal interpreted that the interest at 15% for delayed payment assumes the character of income and should be treated as income from other sources.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal decided that only the interest at 15% received for delayed deposit of compensation should be considered as income in the hands of the assessee.

3. Tax Treatment of Interest Received

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 145A(b) and Section 56(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act deal with the taxability of interest on compensation.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal observed that the authorities below erred in treating the entire interest as income from other sources. It was determined that only the interest at 15% should be treated as income, allowing for deductions as per Section 57(iv).

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for verification, directing that only the interest at 15% be considered for disallowance, with necessary deductions granted under Section 57.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

Core principles established:

"The interest received u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act shall partake the character of revenue receipt as per the extant provisions of section 56(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961."

Final determinations on each issue:

• The interest at 9% received under Section 28 is compensatory and not taxable as income from other sources.
• The interest at 15% received under Section 34 for delayed payment is taxable as income from other sources.
• The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify and compute the interest attributable to the 15% rate for tax purposes, with appropriate deductions under Section 57.

The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the Assessing Officer to reassess the taxability of the interest components in line with the Tribunal's findings.

---