Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the immunity under the Remittances of Foreign Exchange and Investment in Foreign Exchange Bonds (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991 bars the Enforcement Directorate from making a preliminary inquiry or investigation where the received amount is alleged not to be a protected remittance within Section 2(b).
Analysis: The immunity provision operates only when the amount received answers the statutory definition of "remittance" and the recipient falls within the protected class. The bar against inquiry or investigation is therefore not absolute; it does not preclude an inquiry limited to determining whether the transaction is in fact a remittance within the meaning of Section 2(b). If the material collected by the investigating agencies indicates prima facie violation of the foreign exchange law, that material may form the basis of a preliminary inquiry by the Enforcement Directorate. Where such inquiry shows that the amount does not constitute protected remittance, formal inquiry or investigation is not barred. An interpretation that disables examination of the basic jurisdictional fact would make the foreign exchange restrictions ineffective.
Conclusion: The immunity under the Act does not prevent the Enforcement Directorate from proceeding with a preliminary inquiry and, if warranted, further investigation.