Implied deception in mortgage payment dealings can amount to cheating when conduct shows a false promise to return the deed.

Deception under Section 415 of the Indian Penal Code may be inferred from conduct, not only express words, where a person knowingly accepts payment on a clear footing and then acts contrary to that understanding. Here, the accused accepted money tendered to discharge a mortgage debt, remained silent about any alleged different claim, and withheld the mortgage deed after payment. The conduct was treated as an implied representation that the money would be accepted in discharge of the mortgage and the deed returned. The later refusal showed that the representation was never intended to be honoured, and the conduct amounted to cheating, with conviction and sentence upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the accused's conduct in accepting payment tendered for discharge of a mortgage debt, while withholding the mortgage deed and setting up a different claim after the payment, amounted to cheating under Section 415 of the Indian Penal Code.

Analysis: The payment was made on the clear understanding, known to the accused, that it was towards the zurpeshgi mortgage debt and that the mortgage deed would be returned on receipt of the money. The Court held that deception under Section 415 need not be by express words and may be inferred from conduct and the nature of the transaction. By remaining silent about the alleged other debt, accepting the money on the footing on which it was offered, and then refusing to return the deed while asserting a different claim only after payment, the accused made an implied representation that he would accept the money in discharge of the mortgage debt and return the document. The subsequent refusal showed that the representation was never intended to be honoured.

Conclusion: The accused's conduct amounted to cheating, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

---