Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 on the basis of the alleged agreement for sale and possession.
Analysis: Protection under Section 53-A is available only when there is a written contract signed by the transferor, the transferee has taken or continued possession in part-performance of the contract, and the transferee has performed or has always been ready and willing to perform the essential terms of the contract. The provision operates as a limited defence against enforcement of rights by the transferor, but it is an exception to the ordinary requirements governing transfer and must therefore be strictly construed. In the present case, the concurrent factual findings were that the alleged sale agreement and the claimed possession were not proved. Once those foundational facts failed, the statutory protection could not be invoked. The related requirement under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 regarding readiness and willingness also supported the denial of relief.
Conclusion: The petitioners were not entitled to protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 can be invoked only on proof of a written contract, possession in part-performance, and readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the provision must be strictly construed as a limited defence.