Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings alleging offences under Sections 353 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code were liable to be quashed in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Analysis: The governing test for quashing at the initial stage is whether the uncontroverted allegations, taken at face value, prima facie disclose the offence, and whether continuation of the prosecution would serve any useful purpose or amount to abuse of process. For Section 353, the essential requirement is assault or use of criminal force against a public servant with intent to deter the discharge of official duty; the materials disclosed no assault or use of criminal force by the appellants. For Section 506, read with the definition of criminal intimidation in Section 503, there must be a threat made with intent to cause alarm or to compel a person to act or omit to act; the Facebook comments, on the facts alleged, did not disclose such intention or the requisite ingredients. Since the page was treated as a public forum for grievances and the allegations, even if accepted, did not satisfy the statutory ingredients, continuation of the prosecution was unwarranted.
Conclusion: The FIR and criminal proceedings were liable to be quashed and the appellants succeeded.